Regulators don’t fine missed checks. They fine bad data.

Most compliance teams run reviews on a schedule. But registry changes don’t wait for your next review cycle. Directors change, ownership shifts and company status lapses, often long before the next scheduled check catches up.

And for organisations operating across Asia’s fastest-moving markets, that gap is where compliance and counterparty risk quietly builds.

We will break down where periodic monitoring falls short for cross-border payment platforms, wallets and acquirers operating in Asia, and share a first look at findings from AsiaVerify’s APAC registry monitoring study.

Join us to explore what these findings mean for your compliance strategy, and how firms can strengthen ongoing KYB monitoring in complex markets.

1.   What does ongoing KYB monitoring mean in practice, and where do regulatory expectations extend beyond scheduled reviews?
2.   How often and how quickly does company data change between KYB reviews across Asia, according to new research, and what could these findings mean for payments and fintech firms looking to strengthen ongoing monitoring?
3.   Where can the gap between periodic checks and real-time registry changes create compliance and counterparty risk?
4.   How can changes to directors, ownership, business activity and company status affect an organisation’s risk profile?
5.   Where can existing KYB and monitoring approaches leave gaps across complex markets?

Speakers: