Merchant regulation roadmap H1 2026

Q1 2026 marks a critical phase for merchant regulation, with developments across contactless payment flexibility, BNPL oversight, APP fraud reimbursement schemes, and mobile ecosystem competition moving from policy design to implementation. This roadmap highlights the key reforms, timelines, and compliance risks that merchant payment leaders must navigate to stay ahead in an increasingly complex regulatory landscape.

Introduction

About the roadmap

Spanning payment acceptance, fraud liability, digital commerce, and platform economics, regulation touches every part of the merchant payments value chain. The UK/EU market is regulated by several authorities with each initiative having consultation periods, policy statements, and often staggered implementation windows. Add rapidly evolving payment technologies and competitive dynamics, staying on top of regulatory changes becomes challenging.

Payments Intelligence produces regulation roadmaps twice yearly—in Q1 and Q4—to address this complexity, setting out consultation papers and policy initiatives chronologically, summarising the change brought by each, the legal issues they pose, and suggested next steps to take in response. 

The roadmaps draw directly on the papers published by the UK’s and EU disparate regulatory bodies, as well as our membership of senior compliance leads and legal professionals. This edition covers reforms to contactless payment limits, the introduction of BNPL regulation, and the evolution of APP fraud reimbursement schemes. The roadmap also tracks developments in mobile ecosystem competition, payment account termination rules, and open finance initiatives, alongside updates to payment infrastructure standards including ISO 20022 migration.

Emerging payment methods and international developments are a further area of emphasis. The report maps cryptoasset, stablecoin, and AI regulation in the UK, EU, and US, helping merchants understand potential implications for payment infrastructure and fraud systems. Taken together, these themes illustrate a regulatory agenda that is increasingly focused on reducing checkout friction, clarifying fraud liability, constraining platform power, and ensuring payment system resilience.

Foreword

H1 2026 brings a decisive shift in the merchant regulatory climate. Measures once debated are now crystallising into binding obligations across contactless, BNPL, APP fraud, mobile ecosystems and AI governance. This roadmap distils the substance behind each reform, clarifies points of legal exposure, and sets out the practical judgements required of payment leaders. In a landscape shaped by supervisory scrutiny and rapid technological change, foresight, discipline and informed execution will determine competitive resilience.
Benjamin David
Head of Intelligence

Why it matters

Payments regulation is moving from policy to implementation. This roadmap highlights what matters, when it matters, and why it matters.

The challenge merchants face

Scattered market insight

Risky strategic planning

Limited visibility of peers

Regulatory change rarely arrives in isolation. Overlapping initiatives, staggered timelines, and varying levels of certainty can make it difficult for firms to assess what genuinely requires attention. This roadmap is intended to reduce that complexity by providing a clearer line of sight across developments.

What this roadmap helps you do

Focus on what needs attention

Understand timing and sequencing

Reduce compliance risk

By setting developments out by timing and theme, the roadmap helps teams distinguish between what is imminent, what is emerging, and what can be monitored. This enables more informed internal discussions and better sequencing of regulatory work.

Who this is for

This roadmap is designed for merchant teams involved in understanding, planning for, and responding to regulatory change across payment acceptance and commerce. Personas include:

While the roadmap is relevant across functions, it is particularly useful for teams responsible for translating regulatory change into business action. It can be used as a shared reference point across departments to align understanding and expectations.

How to use this roadmap

Scan for relevance

Identify priorities

Use for planning

The roadmap should be used as a planning and orientation tool alongside existing internal processes and external advice. It is intended to support discussion, prioritisation, and forward planning rather than replace detailed legal or regulatory analysis.

Timeline

The timeline below sets out the sequencing of key regulatory developments affecting merchant payments, highlighting anticipated milestones, areas of regulatory change, and points of operational impact. It is intended to support planning by indicating where merchants should prioritise assessment, mobilisation, and delivery across near, medium, and longer-term horizons.

Member insights

Recent and immediate developments: Q1 2026

The FCA is advancing cryptoasset regulation, removing the £100 contactless limit from march 2026, and accelerating open finance. Merchants should monitor developments and assess readiness.The FCA is introducing cryptoasset regulation, removing the £100 contactless limit from march 2026, and accelerating open finance with a roadmap due march 2026. Merchants should monitor developments and assess payment partner readiness.

Cryptoasset regulation – what merchants should know

🟩 Long-term/indicative

While the FCA’s consultations on cryptoasset regulation (covering new regulated activities, disclosure, market abuse, and prudential requirements) are aimed primarily at crypto firms, merchants should be aware of the potential long-term implications for payments systems and embedded financial services. The rules under discussion could, in the future, affect how merchants interact with stablecoins, crypto-enabled payments, and other emerging payment methods.

Key points for merchants:

  • Regulation is expanding, and the UK is establishing a robust framework for cryptoassets, including stablecoins, trading platforms, staking, lending, and DeFi.
  • Although direct obligations will not apply to most merchants, changes in regulation may affect the infrastructure behind payment providers, BNPL, and subscription services, as well as the security and stability of crypto-enabled payments.
  • Awareness is important—these rules could indirectly influence risk management, fraud controls, and payment processing choices in the medium term.
  • • Indirect impact on payment systems and providers handling crypto or stablecoin transactions.

    • Operational or compliance implications from partners adapting to new regulations.

• Monitor FCA crypto and stablecoin regulations.

• Check readiness of payment and fintech partners for upcoming changes.

• Consider potential effects on fraud controls and operational processes.

FCA lifts £100 limit on contactless payments

🟥 Urgent, significant impact

The FCA has confirmed rule changes that will give banks and payment service providers greater flexibility to set contactless payment limits. From March 2026, banks and payment providers with strong fraud controls will be able to set their own contactless payment limits, rather than being restricted by a single industry-wide cap.

The change reflects the growing dominance of contactless in the UK. Nearly 95% of eligible in-store card transactions were contactless in 2024, highlighting consumer demand for faster, frictionless payments. Merchants can also offer customers the option to set personalised limits or disable contactless entirely.

Consumer protections remain unchanged. Customers will continue to be reimbursed for unauthorised transactions, including lost or stolen cards. The FCA views this reform as a way to encourage investment in fraud controls, balancing flexibility with safety.

Adoption of higher limits will be voluntary, but firms choosing to participate must clearly communicate changes to customers. The move is expected to benefit high-street and hospitality businesses by enabling faster, smoother checkout experiences.

Key dates:

  • Banks and payment providers “with strong fraud controls” will be able to remove the £100 contactless limit from March 2026.
  • Clear customer communication is required to avoid complaints or Consumer Duty breaches
  • Firms should assess fraud monitoring and reimbursement processes ahead of March 2026
  • Review customer controls, including optional limit-setting and opt-out features
  • Prepare clear customer communications for any changes to contactless limits

FCA announces partnership to accelerate delivery of open finance

🟧 uncertain timing/impact

The FCA is accelerating open finance initiatives, with a formal roadmap expected by March 2026. While much of the programme is aimed at banks and fintechs, merchants should pay attention, as open finance will influence how customer financial data can be accessed and used across services.

The Smart Data Accelerator, launched in September 2025, tests real-world data-sharing use cases in a controlled environment. Lessons from these trials could affect merchants offering subscriptions, BNPL, or other embedded payment options, particularly around customer consent, data security, and operational readiness.

TechSprints on mortgages and SME finance are also exploring practical consumer benefits from open finance. For merchants, these highlight the broader trend: more accessible, structured financial data is coming—and it may touch your payment flows, loyalty programmes, and customer interactions.

Key dates

  • The FCA will set out a roadmap for open finance by March 2026.
  • Uncertainty around how open finance participation may impact merchant services, especially where embedded finance or subscription payments rely on shared financial data.

  • Data protection, consent, and liability risks as customer financial information becomes more widely accessible through open finance initiatives.
  • Assess readiness for expanded data-sharing, including consent management, data security, and governance frameworks.

  • Engage with payment partners and fintech providers to understand how open finance developments might affect payment flows, customer interactions, or new services.

  • Monitor the FCA’s roadmap publication in March 2026 to plan ahead and ensure compliance with any forthcoming expectations.

Member insights

Short to medium-term impact: 2026

The 2026 medium-term agenda covers merchant payment acceptance, platform competition and fraud liability. BNPL regulation, mobile ecosystem reform and contract termination rules tighten merchant compliance requirements, while APP fraud scheme evolution, AI governance expectations and ISO 20022 updates increase operational complexity and cost pressures.

ISO 20022 Change Management – November 2026 (Payment System Operators)

🟧 Important, uncertain timing/impact

The Bank of England will implement ISO 20022 schema updates in November 2026 for CHAPS, RTGS, and deferred net settlement payments. While these changes are aimed at payment system operators, merchants should note that they could affect:

  • High-value payments and reconciliations with banks or payment providers
  • Reporting or settlement processes for large transactions

The 2026 updates are mostly minor corrections and incremental improvements. Some previously planned enhancements have been deferred to future release cycles, giving merchants and partners time to prepare.

Key dates:
  • The changes will come into effect in November 2026.
  • Mandatory interoperability-driven schema changes remain binding and require timely implementation
  • Update internal implementation plans to reflect the 2026 scope

Payment Services and Payment Accounts (Contract Termination) (Amendment)

🟥 Urgent, significant impact

From 28 April 2026, merchants that operate payment accounts or their own payment rails will need to comply with updated rules on contract termination and account refusals. The Regulations strengthen transparency for consumers and ensure clear communication when accounts are refused or terminated. For merchants running their own accounts or payment services, this means:

  • Providing clear, specific reasons when refusing an application or terminating a contract, except where prohibited by law.
  • Informing users of complaint rights, including escalation to the Financial Ombudsman Service.
  • Distinguishing contracts entered into before and on or after 28 April 2026, with at least 90 days’ notice for new contracts, unless an exception applies (e.g., serious crime, money laundering, immigration requirements, or regulator directives).

These measures balance transparency and fairness with the need to preserve financial crime controls and regulatory compliance.

  • Increased complaints and potential litigation if termination or refusal reasons are not detailed and compliant.

  • Operational risk in applying notice periods correctly depending on contract start date.
  • Review and update termination/refusal policies, templates, and customer communications.

  • Ensure internal systems can distinguish contracts pre- and post-28 April 2026.

  • Train staff managing accounts or payment services on new disclosure and notice requirements.

UK DMCC Mobile Ecosystems Review

🟧 Important, uncertain timing/impact

The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act came into force in January 2025, granting the Competition and Markets Authority new powers to designate firms with Strategic Market Status in digital markets. In October 2025, the CMA designated both Apple and Google’s mobile ecosystems—covering iOS, App Store, WebKit, Android, Google Play, and Chrome—as having Strategic Market Status until October 2030.

Following publication of its roadmap in July 2025, the CMA began consulting on conduct requirements from autumn 2025, with further consultations on additional measures expected throughout the first half of 2026. These conduct requirements could mandate opening access to key device functionality, enabling app downloads outside official app stores, permitting alternative payment systems without platform fees, and removing restrictions on in-app payment communication.

Unlike the EU’s Digital Markets Act, the DMCC framework gives the CMA the flexibility to impose bespoke conduct requirements tailored to UK market conditions. For merchants operating e-commerce apps with in-app purchases, these changes could fundamentally alter payment routing and fee structures. Non-compliance carries penalties of up to 10% of global turnover, making early preparation essential.

  • Regulatory uncertainty until CMA finalises conduct requirements
  • UK divergence from EU DMA could create compliance complexity for cross-border operations
  • Potential changes to Apple Pay/Google Pay dominance affecting payment method mix
  • Monitor ongoing CMA conduct requirement consultations (H1 2026)
  • Assess readiness for potential alternative payment options on iOS/Android UK
  • Engage with industry consultations on mobile ecosystem reform

Regulating Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL)

🟥 Urgent, significant impact

Following CP25/23 on deferred payment credit (DPC), better known as buy now pay later, regulation will come into force in 2026. Third-party lenders offering interest-free DPC agreements (repayable in 12 or fewer instalments within 12 months) to finance purchases from merchants will fall within the FCA’s regulatory perimeter. Merchants offering DPC directly to customers will remain exempt.

The consultation responds to rapid growth in the sector, which has increased from £0.06bn in 2017 to over £13bn in 2024, according to FCA data. Additionally, there are concerns that unregulated DPC lending may expose consumers to affordability risks, insufficient pre-contract information, and poor outcomes for borrowers in financial difficulty. Around 20% of UK adults used DPC in 2024, with usage higher among consumers already experiencing financial stress.

The FCA proposes a proportionate regime that largely leverages existing consumer credit rules and the Consumer Duty, rather than creating a bespoke framework. Proposals cover pre- and post-contract information requirements, proportionate creditworthiness assessments, complaints handling and access to the Financial Ombudsman Service, and new data-reporting obligations (including Product Sales Data).

A Temporary Permissions Regime (TPR) will allow currently unauthorised DPC lenders to continue operating while their applications are assessed.

Key dates

  • A policy statement and final rules are expected in early 2026, with regulation day on 15 July 2026.
  • The window for TPR registration runs from 15 May to 1 July 2026.
  • Increased compliance risk around creditworthiness assessments, disclosures, and Consumer Duty outcomes
  • Potential enforcement or redress exposure where historic DPC practices are inconsistent with new standards
  • Firms offering third-party BNPL must obtain FCA authorisation or enter the TPR by July 2026
  • Assess whether DPC activities fall within scope and whether FCA permissions are required
  • Review product design, disclosures, affordability checks, and complaints processes against proposed rules

UK APP fraud reimbursement scheme – review and evolution

🟧 Important, uncertain timing/impact

The UK’s mandatory authorised push payment fraud reimbursement scheme, which came into force in October 2024, requires payment service providers to reimburse scam victims up to £85,000 per claim, with costs split equally between sending and receiving PSPs. This creates indirect effects for merchants through potential fee changes or enhanced verification requirements from their payment providers.

The scheme creates operational complexity for PSPs managing reimbursement obligations. Reimbursement disputes can be escalated to the Financial Ombudsman Service (£430,000 cap), where “fair and reasonable” standards may differ from PSR scheme criteria, creating regulatory uncertainty that PSPs may manage through stricter controls or higher fees.

Data shows that 97% of claims from APP scams, approximately £112 million, were reimbursed to victims within 35 days of the scheme launching. An independent review by Frontier Economics, which began in October 2025, will assess the scheme’s effectiveness and could lead to changes in reimbursement caps, liability allocation, or compliance requirements. The PSR proposed a December 2026 deadline for Reporting Standard B adoption (subject to final confirmation following late 2025 consultation).

The scheme’s evolution through 2026 focuses on assessing effectiveness and standardising compliance data reporting, affecting merchants through changes to payment acceptance costs and verification friction as PSPs adapt to reimbursement obligations.

Key dates

Q2 2026: Frontier Economics independent post-implementation review publishes findings
December 2026: Proposed deadline for Reporting Standard B adoption (subject to final confirmation)

  • Potential fee increases as PSPs pass through reimbursement costs to merchant clients
  • Enhanced payment verification requirements creating checkout friction (such as Confirmation of Payee checks)
  • Delayed or declined legitimate payments due to stricter fraud controls imposed by PSPs managing their liability exposure
  • Possible changes to payment acceptance terms and conditions following Q2 2026 Frontier Economics review
  • Additional onboarding or verification requirements as PSPs strengthen receiving account monitoring
  • Engage with payment providers to understand how reimbursement costs affect pricing structures and contract terms
  • Assess checkout friction from enhanced verification requirements and plan for potential conversion rate impacts
  • Review customer communication strategies for explaining additional payment verification steps to reduce abandonment
  • Monitor Q2 2026 Frontier Economics review outcomes for potential changes to scheme scope, caps, or requirements that may affect payment provider terms
  • Budget for potential fee increases in financial planning, particularly if processing high volumes of customer-initiated payments

Extended CHAPS Settlement Hours (Phase 1)

🟩 Long-term/indicative

The Bank of England plans to extend CHAPS settlement hours from 1.30am, ahead of the current 6am start, as part of its RTGS renewal. For most merchants, this change is handled by banks or PSPs, so day-to-day operations are unlikely to be affected. Merchants running their own rails or treasury operations may need to assess early access for cross-border payments or liquidity planning.

  • Minimal direct impact for merchants using banks or PSPs.
  • Operational and liquidity considerations for merchants managing in-house settlement.
  • Stay aware of the extended hours and how your PSP manages them.
  • Evaluate potential benefits if operating your own rails or treasury systems.

UK AI Regulation – 2026 Horizon

🟧 Important, uncertain timing/impact

The UK government plans to legislate for artificial intelligence, with oversight delivered through existing regulators such as the FCA, PSR, ICO, CMA, and Ofcom. For merchants, this is relevant if AI is used in payments, fraud detection, credit scoring, or customer decisioning. The FCA emphasises a principles-based approach, covering safety, transparency, fairness, accountability, and redress.

In January 2026, the Treasury Select Committee published a report concluding that 75% of UK financial services firms now use AI, yet the Bank of England, FCA and HM Treasury risk exposing consumers to “potentially serious harm” through their “wait-and-see” approach. The committee received evidence of AI-driven decision-making in credit and insurance lacking transparency, AI financial decision-making threatening financial exclusion for disadvantaged consumers, unregulated financial advice from AI search engines, and AI usage increasing fraud. The FCA and ICO announced in June 2025 they will create a joint statutory code of practice for firms deploying AI for automated decision-making.

Key dates

  • End of 2026: FCA must publish comprehensive practical guidance on consumer protection rules and SM&CR accountability for AI
  • End of 2026: HM Treasury must designate major AI and cloud providers as critical third parties
  • Ongoing: Joint FCA/ICO statutory code of practice development for AI automated decision-making
  • Ongoing: AI-specific stress-testing required from Bank of England and FCA
  • FCA’s reactive approach leaves firms with “little practical clarity” on how existing rules apply to AI usage
  • Senior managers “on the hook” for AI harm under SM&CR despite AI model “lack of explainability” creating control demonstration difficulties
  • AI-driven credit and insurance decision-making lacking transparency may breach Consumer Duty
  • AI financial decision-making and product tailoring threatening financial exclusion for disadvantaged consumers
  • AI fraud detection systems may increase fraud whilst simultaneously declining legitimate transactions
  • Over-reliance on small number of US technology firms for AI and cloud services threatening operational resilience (AWS outage October 2025 disrupted Lloyds and other banks)
  • Implement comprehensive AI governance covering bias testing, explainability, audit trails, and consumer redress with clear SM&CR accountability allocation
  • Maintain detailed AI model registers documenting decision logic to evidence senior management understanding and control under SM&CR
  • Test AI systems for transparency failures and discriminatory outcomes in credit decisioning, insurance pricing, and payment acceptance before deployment
  • Assess whether AI chatbots, recommendation engines, or agentic commerce systems constitute unregulated financial advice
  • Document clear accountability lines for AI-driven harm (developers, deploying institution, data providers) to address regulatory uncertainty
  • Map critical dependencies on US technology firms for AI and cloud services and develop contingency plans for provider outages
  • Prepare for AI-specific stress testing requirements covering both cyber resilience and market shock scenarios
  • Monitor FCA comprehensive practical guidance (due end 2026) covering consumer protection rules and SM&CR expectations for AI
  • Track Critical Third Parties Regime implementation as major AI/cloud providers designated (required end 2026)

Bank of England Digital Pound – Status Update

🟩 Long-term/indicative

The Bank of England has signalled caution on a UK digital pound, suggesting commercial bank-led digital payments may reduce the need for a central bank-issued alternative. While a digital pound remains technically feasible, plans are effectively on hold, creating strategic uncertainty for merchants exploring CBDC-related services.

  • Uncertainty may delay investment in CBDC infrastructure.

  • UK divergence from other jurisdictions could affect cross-border settlement and interoperability.
  • Resources may be misallocated if plans are reactivated later, risking competitive disadvantage.
  • Focus investment on stablecoins, tokenised deposits, and interoperable payment solutions.

  • Monitor Bank of England and HM Treasury updates for any renewed digital pound initiatives.

  • Scenario-plan for both no-CBDC and accelerated CBDC outcomes.
  • Engage with industry pilots and standards groups to stay prepared for future payment innovations.

International regulatory developments

International developments directly affect UK merchants with EU operations or cross-border euro payments. EU instant payments mandate ten-second settlement for euro transfers, while the AI Act restricts fraud detection systems and PSD3 strengthens merchant liability. The Digital Euro proposes capped merchant fees, and mandatory Verification of Payee increases payment friction across European markets.

EU Instant Payments Regulation (SEPA Instant)

🟧 Important, uncertain timing/impact

The EU Instant Payments Regulation, adopted in March 2024, makes instant euro credit transfers the default across the EU. Funds must be credited to recipients within ten seconds, 24/7, with fees capped at standard credit transfer rates.

Verification of Payee and daily sanctions checks are mandatory, enhancing fraud protection.

  • Cross-border euro payments must comply with instant settlement rules, affecting cash flow and reconciliation.

  • PSPs may require updates to payment infrastructure to support real-time settlement.

  • Failure to adapt systems could lead to payment delays, reconciliation errors, or regulatory scrutiny.
  • Assess whether euro-denominated payments to and from EU customers are impacted.

  • Update reconciliation, treasury, and payment processing systems for instant settlement.

  • Coordinate with PSPs and banks to ensure compliance with Verification of Payee and sanctions screening requirements.

EU AI Act

🟥 Urgent, significant impact

The EU Artificial Intelligence Act entered into force on 1 August 2024 with phased implementation through 2027. Prohibited AI practices came into effect on 2 February 2025, including a ban on AI systems assessing risk of criminal activity based solely on profiling of natural persons or personality traits. This creates compliance challenges for AI-based fraud detection and anti-money laundering systems, which must now implement human oversight to avoid falling under prohibited practices. High-risk AI fraud detection systems must provide explainability, implement human oversight, maintain high data quality, and be auditable under the Act’s requirements.

For platforms and marketplaces, AI systems that affect users’ earning ability are classified as “high-risk” under the Annexe III employment provisions, which require stringent compliance, including conformity assessments and CE marking. Credit-scoring and fraud-detection AI systems are subject to documentation, transparency, and cybersecurity requirements, and financial institutions using AI for payment fraud detection must comply by 2 August 2026. Non-compliance carries penalties up to €35 million or 7% of global annual turnover.

  • Fines up to €35 million or 7% of global annual turnover for prohibited practices
  • AI fraud systems that deny services based on predicted behaviour (not actual misconduct)
  • Black-box AI models insufficient – must provide clear justifications for fraud flags
  • Risk of discriminatory outcomes if AI models not properly governed
  • Audit existing fraud detection and AML AI systems for compliance with prohibitions
  • Implement explainability frameworks showing how AI reaches fraud decisions
  • Establish human oversight mechanisms for AI-generated alerts
  • Document AI model design, training data, and decision-making processes
  • Assess bias and discrimination risks in payment fraud models

EU PSD3 & PSR

🟩 Long-term/indicative

The EU’s upcoming PSD3 Directive and PSR Regulation will overhaul payments law, replacing PSD2 and the Electronic Money Directive. Key changes include mandatory Verification of Payee for all credit transfers, stronger fraud and liability rules, enhanced consumer controls, and expanded obligations for platform and technology providers.

PSD3 will govern licensing and supervision, while the PSR applies directly across all member states.

  • Stronger fraud and liability provisions increase operational and reimbursement risk if controls fail.
  • Direct applicability of the PSR reduces flexibility, raising non-compliance risk for UK firms interacting with EU payments.
  • Expanded obligations for tech platforms may create operational or competition risk.
  • Map firm activities against PSD3/PSR obligations, including crypto and open-banking flows.
  • Review verification-of-payee processes, fraud detection, reimbursement, and customer limit controls.
  • Begin planning system and policy updates ahead of the expected adoption and 21-month transition period.

Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)

🟧 Important, uncertain timing/impact

MiCA establishes the EU’s first comprehensive framework for cryptoassets, covering issuance, custody, trading, and marketing. Cryptoasset service providers (CASPs) must be authorised from 1 July 2026, and issuers face stricter disclosure, prudential, and conduct obligations. The regulation also sets rules for stablecoins and market abuse.

  • Operating without MiCA authorisation after 1 July 2026 risks enforcement or exit from EU markets.
  • New disclosure and marketing standards increase liability for misleading statements.
  • Partner or outsourcing arrangements may create hidden compliance risks.
  • Divergence from UK crypto rules adds cross-border complexity.
  • Review crypto-related activities (payments, custody, trading, marketing) against MiCA requirements.
  • Prepare authorisation applications with governance, risk, and capital frameworks.
  • Update disclosures, white papers, and marketing to meet MiCA standards.

Digital Euro – Merchant Implications

🟩 Long-term/indicative

The European Central Bank (ECB) and EU co-legislators are progressing a retail digital euro, designed to coexist with cash and private payment solutions across the euro area. It will support online and offline payments, with holding limits, capped merchant fees during an initial five-year transition, and requirements for fair access to mobile hardware and software. The digital euro could become operational around 2029, subject to EU legislative adoption and ECB testing.

  • Potential overlap with existing card and instant payment infrastructure may reduce revenues or cannibalise current payment services.

  • Strict privacy and data-protection obligations could increase compliance burdens.
  • Divergence from UK digital pound or stablecoin frameworks may create cross-border interoperability challenges.
  • Monitor EU legislative progress and ECB pilot outcomes to understand likely design and distribution.
  • Engage in industry consultations on fees, access, and technical standards.
  • Assess impact on revenue models, operational processes, and customer demand.
  • Plan for interoperability testing with SEPA Instant, card networks, and UK digital or tokenised payment rails.

GENIUS Act – US Stablecoin Regulatory Horizon

🟩 Long-term/indicative

The GENIUS Act establishes the first comprehensive US federal regime for payment stablecoins, restricting issuance to licensed entities and imposing prudential, reserve, and audit requirements. It clarifies treatment under US law and defines payment stablecoins as fully backed, redeemable at par, with segregated reserves and monthly certifications. Foreign issuers can operate only if their home regime is judged “substantially similar” and reserves are held in the US. The regime takes effect on 18 January 2027, or earlier if implementing regulations are finalised.

  • Strict prudential, operational, and disclosure obligations; non-compliance risks licence revocation or enforcement.
  • Foreign issuers face additional compliance costs, needing “substantially similar” home regulation and US reserve custody.
  • Liability arises from misreporting, failed audits, or reserve breaches.
  • Market participation may be delayed or restricted due to interpretation of “substantially similar.”
  • Assess OCC registration and licence requirements ahead of the effective date.

  • Align custody and reserve arrangements with US requirements.

  • Implement systems for monthly reserve certifications, independent audits, and ongoing disclosure.

  • For foreign firms, evaluate home regime compatibility and plan compliance or restructuring.

Review financial reporting and accounting treatment to reflect clarified regulatory status.

Cross-sector regulation

Beyond payments-specific rules, merchants face new obligations across retail operations, environmental compliance, and digital accessibility. The Deposit Return Scheme reshapes payment flows and customer experience, Extended Producer Responsibility creates packaging cost obligations, and accessibility regulations mandate inclusive checkout journeys to prevent discrimination claims.

Deposit Return Scheme (DRS)

The UK Deposit Return Scheme launches in October 2027, requiring all physical retailers selling single-use drinks containers to charge consumers an additional deposit per item (amount not yet set). Consumers recoup deposits by recycling containers through Reverse Vending Machines (RVMs). The scheme affects all retailers selling drinks—from supermarkets to gym vending machines—creating new operational requirements for deposit collection, RVM installation, and refund processing.

The default retailer position involves printing millions of QR codes on thermal paper for redemption at point-of-sale or customer service desks. Payment providers are developing alternative solutions enabling consumers to tap cards or phones on RVM readers for instant refunds, avoiding paper-based systems. Retailers see RVMs as potential footfall drivers and differentiation opportunities, though many aim to redirect deposit value to closed-loop loyalty schemes rather than immediate cash refunds. The scheme represents a fundamental change to retail payment flows, inventory management, and customer experience design across the UK drinks retail sector.

Key date:

  • October 2027 launch
  • New deposit collection and refund processing requirements creating operational complexity across all retail channels
  • RVM installation, maintenance, and space allocation costs impacting store layouts and capital expenditure
  • Consumer complaint risk if refund processes are unclear, slow, or create friction
  • Integration challenges between RVMs, point-of-sale systems, payment terminals, and loyalty platforms
  • Potential regulatory penalties for non-compliance with deposit collection or refund obligations
  • Data protection considerations for card-based refund systems tracking consumer recycling behaviour
  • Assess space requirements and costs for RVM installation across retail estate
  • Evaluate refund processing options: QR code/thermal paper vs card tap-to-refund vs loyalty scheme integration
  • Engage with payment providers (e.g., Worldpay) on digital refund solutions to avoid paper-based systems
  • Review point-of-sale system capabilities for deposit processing and reconciliation
  • Develop customer communication strategies explaining the deposit and refund process
  • Plan staff training on deposit collection, RVM operation, and customer refund queries

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for Packaging

Extended Producer Responsibility for packaging came into force in 2023, with full compliance requirements phased through 2026-2027. The regime shifts packaging waste management costs from local authorities to businesses that place packaged goods on the UK market. Merchants pay fees based on packaging tonnage and material type, with higher fees for non-recyclable or hard-to-recycle packaging. The scheme covers all packaging—from primary product packaging to transit packaging and e-commerce shipping materials. Fee calculations require detailed data collection on packaging volumes, materials, and recyclability across supply chains.

Online merchants face particular complexity in tracking packaging used by third-party sellers or fulfilment partners. The regime aims to incentivise packaging reduction and recyclability improvements whilst funding UK waste collection infrastructure. PackUK (within DEFRA) operates the scheme administrator, with reporting via online portals that require integration with inventory and procurement systems. Non-compliance risks, enforcement action, and reputational damage as packaging sustainability becomes a consumer purchasing factor.

Key date

  • 2026-2027 (phased full compliance)
  • Mandatory fees based on packaging tonnage creating new operational costs requiring accurate data collection
  • Complexity in attributing packaging responsibility across multi-party supply chains (manufacturers, importers, retailers, online marketplaces)
  • Data collection and reporting burdens requiring system integration between procurement, inventory, and EPR portals
  • Fee structures favouring recyclable packaging may require supply chain or packaging redesign to manage costs
  • Online marketplaces face attribution challenges for third-party seller packaging
  • Potential enforcement action or penalties for under-reporting or non-compliance
  • Reputational risk as consumers increasingly factor packaging sustainability into purchasing decisions
  • Register with PackUK and environmental regulators
  • Audit packaging across supply chain: primary, secondary, transit, and e-commerce shipping materials
  • Collect detailed packaging data: tonnage, material type, recyclability status for fee calculations
  • Integrate EPR data requirements into procurement and inventory management systems
  • For online marketplaces, establish clear packaging responsibility allocation with third-party sellers
  • Review packaging design and supplier selection to minimise EPR fees (shift to recyclable materials)
  • Budget for EPR fees in financial planning based on packaging tonnage projections
  • Assess whether to absorb EPR costs or pass through to consumers via pricing

Website Accessibility Regulations

Website accessibility requirements under the Equality Act 2010 and Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) (No. 2) Accessibility Regulations 2018 apply to e-commerce merchants, with enforcement increasing through 2025-2026 following high-profile legal cases. The regulations require websites and mobile apps to be perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust for users with disabilities, following Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level AA standards. Critical areas for merchants include checkout flows, payment method selection, form completion, error handling, and screen reader compatibility. Inaccessible websites risk discrimination claims under the Equality Act, with the Equality and Human Rights Commission and individual claimants bringing enforcement action.

High-street retailers, including Co-op, Tesco, and Sainsbury’s, have faced legal challenges over inaccessible websites. Payment-related accessibility failures create a particular risk: inaccessible checkout flows directly prevent disabled customers from completing purchases, strengthening discrimination claims. Mobile apps face additional scrutiny as usage grows. The regulations cover all customer-facing digital touchpoints, including websites, progressive web apps, native mobile apps, and customer account portals.

Key date:

  • Ongoing (enforcement increasing 2025-2026)
  • Legal claims under Equality Act 2010 for disability discrimination if websites are inaccessible
  • Checkout flow accessibility failures directly prevent purchases, strengthening discrimination claims
  • EHRC enforcement action and investigations following consumer complaints
  • Reputational damage from public legal cases (recent high-street retailer challenges)
  • Potential damages, legal costs, and mandatory website remediation orders
  • Payment disputes and chargebacks if accessibility issues prevent transaction completion
  • Mobile app accessibility increasingly scrutinised as usage grows
  • Conduct WCAG 2.1 Level AA accessibility audits on websites, mobile apps, and checkout flows
  • Prioritise payment journey accessibility: form fields, error messages, payment method selection, screen reader compatibility
  • Implement keyboard navigation for all checkout and payment functions (no mouse-only interactions)
  • Ensure payment error messages are clear, accessible, and provide actionable guidance
  • Test checkout flows with assistive technologies (screen readers, voice control, keyboard-only navigation)
  • Provide alternative accessible payment methods if primary flow has accessibility limitations
  • Train development teams on accessibility requirements and integrate testing into release cycles
  • Monitor EHRC guidance and legal developments for evolving accessibility expectations

Member Insights

Takeaway points

Merchants should expect higher compliance costs, greater supervisory scrutiny, and reduced tolerance for weak governance, operational controls, or consumer protection failures.

Operational readiness is now decisive. Extended contactless limits, open finance data-sharing, AI governance frameworks, deposit return schemes and accessibility compliance will test systems, people and third-party dependencies well before formal deadlines.

Early engagement with consultations and implementation planning will be critical. Merchants that move first will be better positioned to manage regulatory risk, protect customers and compete as the UK payments landscape continues to evolve.

LinkedIn
Email
X
WhatsApp

Read more Payments Intelligence

Q2 2026 Regulation Roadmap

A forward-looking overview of key regulatory developments across payments, crypto and financial services, with timelines and practical implications.

Read More »

Upload your profile photo

You need to be logged in to do this!

Membership

Merchant Community Membership

Are you a member of The Payments Association?

Member benefits include free tickets, discounts to more tickets, elevated brand visibility and more. Sign in to book tickets and find out more.

Continue reading

Q1 2026 sees critical payment regulation changes, escalating compliance needs in anti-money laundering, stablecoins, and safeguarding. Join The Payments Association to read the full article.

Become a member to continue reading

Member of The Payments Association? Log in to continue reading