What the UK’s new digital asset legislation means for payments leaders

9 May 2025
by Payments Intelligence

LinkedIn
Email
X
WhatsApp

What is this article about?

New UK regulation bringing cryptoasset activities under the Financial Services and Markets Act.

Why is it important?

It imposes stricter compliance standards and requires FCA authorisation for firms to continue operating legally.

What’s next?

Firms must map their crypto activities, prepare FCA applications, and comply within transitional timelines.

The UK government has significantly expanded the scope of digital asset regulation with the introduction of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Cryptoassets) Order 2025. This new framework brings a comprehensive set of crypto-related activities within the perimeter of the existing financial regulatory regime, applying long-standing standards of oversight to a rapidly evolving market segment.

This legislative shift is more than a procedural update—it represents a strategic turning point for the UK’s approach to digital finance. By embedding crypto within the structure of the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA), the government signals its intent to integrate these technologies into the mainstream financial system, subject to the same rules that govern traditional instruments and institutions.

For compliance leaders in payments and e-money institutions, the regulation marks a pivotal moment—not only in terms of legal obligations but also in how firms define their future role in a maturing digital asset ecosystem. It demands a reassessment of licensing, governance, risk management, and safeguarding procedures across all crypto-related operations.

The message from HM Treasury is unambiguous: cryptoasset activity must now adhere to the same principles of prudence, consumer protection, and operational accountability that apply to conventional financial services. Firms registered solely under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 (MLRs) must urgently consider their next steps, as these permissions will no longer be sufficient. Securing FCA Part 4A authorisation is not just a legal requirement—it is now a strategic necessity.

Industry voice

Why has the treasury introduced this legislation?

The rapid growth of cryptoassets—particularly stablecoins—has outstripped the UK’s existing regulatory framework, exposing critical vulnerabilities in areas such as consumer protection, asset custody, and enforceability of contractual obligations. Although the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has taken steps to register crypto firms under the Money Laundering Regulations (MLRs), this registration primarily targets anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing risks. It does not provide the full regulatory oversight required to safeguard market integrity or investor confidence in an increasingly complex and institutionalising sector.

Recent volatility in global crypto markets, high-profile insolvencies, and persistent scams have underscored the urgent need for more robust regulation. Consumers, institutional investors, and policymakers alike have called for a regime that ensures digital asset activities meet the same prudential and governance standards expected in traditional finance.

This legislation forms part of a broader tightening of the regulatory perimeter, which includes the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA) and the FCA’s enhanced safeguarding standards for payments and e-money firms. Together, these reforms reflect a coordinated policy agenda focused on improving financial system resilience, protecting end users, and increasing accountability across financial technologies.

From a strategic perspective, the UK government aims to balance innovation with risk mitigation, ensuring the country remains globally competitive while reinforcing its reputation as a safe, credible jurisdiction for digital financial services. For compliance leaders, the message is clear: the regulatory trajectory is converging with that of traditional finance, emphasising stability, governance, and long-term viability over rapid market experimentation.

Scope of the new regime

The Order introduces seven new regulated activities under the Regulated Activities Order (RAO), all tied to qualifying cryptoasset operations. These are:

  • Issuing qualifying stablecoins
  • Safeguarding cryptoassets and specified investment cryptoassets
  • Operating a cryptoasset trading platform
  • Dealing in cryptoassets as principal or agent
  • Arranging deals in cryptoassets
  • Cryptoasset staking services
The Order also introduces two new legal categories:

  • Qualifying cryptoassets: Fungible, transferable tokens that are not electronic money, fiat currency, or CBDCs.
  • Qualifying stablecoins: A subset that references fiat currency and aims to maintain a stable value through asset backing.

These activities now require Part 4A FCA permissions under FSMA, with a phased implementation and transitional provisions.

Key implications for payments and e-money organisations

Payments and e-money institutions involved in crypto-related services will need to carefully assess their current activities. Key risks include:

  • Loss of operating permission: Firms relying solely on MLR registration will no longer be allowed to carry on cryptoasset activities once the transitional period ends unless they secure Part 4A authorisation.
  • Supervisory escalation: The FCA has powers to investigate and enforce against unauthorised activity under FSMA. Continued operations without authorisation beyond the grace period could result in criminal penalties or regulatory censure.
  • Business continuity risks: Clients and partners are unlikely to continue working with firms that cannot demonstrate regulated status.

Importantly, MLR-registered firms that have not obtained Part 4A authorisation must now do so to continue operating and cannot rely on their existing status. While transitional arrangements allow continued activity during application processing, failure to act could result in enforcement or forced market exit.

Additionally, Part 4A applications are detailed and time-consuming. Firms that delay may face bottlenecks, especially if the FCA experiences a surge in submissions ahead of the full commencement date.

Compliance readiness: Strategic priorities

The new regime will reshape how payments firms manage compliance across custody, platform operations, and crypto-related payments. Key considerations include:

  • Safeguarding parity: The FCA is likely to align crypto safeguarding requirements with the enhanced standards for e-money and payment firms (e.g. statutory trust accounts, reconciliation, and external audits).
  • Cross-border complexity: The UK’s approach to defining digital assets as a distinct form of personal property diverges from other common law jurisdictions like Singapore and Australia, introducing potential contract enforcement risk.
  • Licensing readiness: Teams must prepare applications for new Part 4A permissions, a process that demands demonstrable competence in systems, controls, risk management, and governance.

For firms offering wallet, exchange, or token issuance services, these shifts will require rethinking commercial models, risk frameworks, and reporting architecture.

Transitional timelines and practical next steps

While the legislation is in final draft form, firms can expect it to come into force in 2025, with staggered implementation. Key timelines and provisions include:

  • Early Commencement for Regulatory Preparations: Certain provisions of the legislation will come into force 21 days after the statutory instrument is made, enabling the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) to issue directions, guidance, and rules in preparation for the full commencement of the regime.
  • Full commencement date: Not yet specified, but a transitional period will follow, firms can continue operations during this time if they apply for FCA authorisation within a defined “relevant application period.”
  • Transitional protection lasts up to 2 years, subject to FCA approval and ongoing information sharing.

Recommended 6–12 month compliance milestones:

  • Next 1 – 3 months: Map all cryptoasset activities to the new regulated categories. Determine whether existing permissions are sufficient.
  • Next 4 – 6 months: Begin Part 4A application preparations including safeguarding policies, risk assessments, governance enhancements, and audit plans.
  • Next 6 – 12 months: File authorisation applications. Notify the FCA of ongoing cryptoasset activities if operating under transitional relief.

Opportunities for first movers

Though the new regulation means a compliance burden for companies active in the relevant markets, there is also strategic upside. Players that move early to secure authorisation and establish best-in-class safeguarding procedures can:

  • Position themselves as trusted custodians and compliant partners, attracting clients who prioritise regulated service providers.
  • Leverage compliance as a competitive differentiator, especially with institutions, public sector partners, or international clients.
  • Lead the market in developing regulated stablecoin-based payment solutions or tokenised financial products.

A 2024 survey by YouGov on behalf of the Financial Conduct Authority found 12% of the 2,199 adults surveyed in the UK owned cryptoassets.

One of the greatest challenges to further adoption of digital assets is concern over scams. Another 2024 survey by ConsenSys and YouGov found 57% of 901 adults familiar with cryptocurrencies reported ‘too many scams’ as their main concern with the technology.

This sentiment presents an opportunity for companies who comply with the regulation quickly, gaining regulatory authorisation and credibility. As consumer protection and transparency become defining market expectations, compliance becomes a growth enabler.

Global regulatory comparisons

The UK’s decision to regulate staking, custody, and dealing explicitly – and to define stablecoins as regulated instruments – puts it ahead of most jurisdictions in scope and clarity. However, its divergence from property law conventions in Singapore and Australia may create legal frictions for firms operating internationally.

Here are some of the key distinctions between the UK’s framework and foreign regulatory counterparts:

International Regulatory Comparisons–Setting the Scene
The UK’s 2025 Cryptoasset Order stands out for its breadth and clarity. To understand its global positioning, we examine how it compares with leading jurisdictions: the EU, Singapore, and the United States.
The EU–MiCA Regulation
The EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework focuses on stablecoins and cryptoasset service providers. It mandates issuer transparency, asset backing, and authorisation. However, it pays less attention to activities like staking or dealing—areas where the UK’s rules go further. Unlike the UK, the EU treats fiat-referenced tokens as electronic money, excluding them from broader crypto definitions.
Singapore–Payment Services Act
Over 50% of scams by volume occur on platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, where fake profiles and deceptive ads lure victims.
United States–Fragmented Oversight
In the US, regulation remains fragmented. Crypto oversight is split across federal bodies like the SEC and CFTC, as well as state regulators. Stablecoin issuers often operate in legal grey zones unless they are federally chartered. Compared to the UK's new order, the US lacks consistency and nationwide clarity.

Strategic recommendations for payments compliance leads

To prepare effectively, compliance leaders should:

  • Map current and future crypto activities against the seven regulated categories.
  • Conduct a Part 4A authorisation gap analysis to understand required controls, documentation, and capital requirements.
  • Review safeguarding processes in light of likely FCA standards, including trust arrangements, reconciliation, and independent audits.
  • Engage early with the FCA and industry associations like The Payments Association to stay ahead of regulatory expectations.
  • Ensure internal training and board-level awareness: This is not just a back-office issue, but a strategic transformation in how crypto is integrated into payments infrastructure.

Regulating for maturity

The UK’s 2025 Cryptoasset Order marks a watershed moment, signalling the end of crypto’s time outside the regulatory perimeter. For compliance leaders, it introduces complexity but also clarity. Crypto is no longer the remit of innovation teams alone; it now sits firmly within the governance, conduct, and operational frameworks expected of any regulated financial activity.

For MLR-registered firms, failing to apply for Part 4A permission in time is not a compliance oversight; it’s an existential risk. Those who act decisively will not only avoid disruption but also help shape a more mature, trusted digital asset ecosystem.

By embedding compliance from the outset, payments firms can help define the next chapter of digital finance, which is stable, trusted, and ready for institutional scale.

LinkedIn
Email
X
WhatsApp

Read more Payments Intelligence

Membership

Merchant Community Membership

Are you a member of The Payments Association?

Member benefits include free tickets, discounts to more tickets, elevated brand visibility and more. Sign in to book tickets and find out more.

Welcome

Log in to access complimentary passes or discounts and access exclusive content as part of your membership. An auto-login link will be sent directly to your email.

Having trouble signing?

We use an auto-login link to ensure optimum security for your members hub. Simply enter your professional work e-mail address into the input area and you’ll receive a link to directly access your account.

First things first

Have you set up your Member account yet? If not, click here to do so.

Still not receiving your auto-login link?

Instead of using passwords, we e-mail you a link to log in to the site. This allows us to automatically verify you and apply member benefits based on your e-mail domain name.

Please click the button below which relates to the issue you’re having.

I didn't receive an e-mail

Tip: Check your spam

Sometimes our e-mails end up in spam. Make sure to check your spam folder for e-mails from The Payments Association

Tip: Check “other” tabs

Most modern e-mail clients now separate e-mails into different tabs. For example, Outlook has an “Other” tab, and Gmail has tabs for different types of e-mails, such as promotional.

Tip: Click the link within 60 minutes

For security reasons the link will expire after 60 minutes. Try submitting the login form again and wait a few seconds for the e-mail to arrive.

Tip: Only click once

The link will only work one time – once it’s been clicked, the link won’t log you in again. Instead, you’ll need to go back to the login screen and generate a new link.

Tip: Delete old login e-mails

Make sure you’re clicking the link on the most recent e-mail that’s been sent to you. We recommend deleting the e-mail once you’ve clicked the link.

Tip: Check your security policies

Some security systems will automatically click on links in e-mails to check for phishing, malware, viruses and other malicious threats. If these have been clicked, it won’t work when you try to click on the link.

Need to change your e-mail address?

For security reasons, e-mail address changes can only be complete by your Member Engagement Manager. Please contact the team directly for further help.

Still got a question?